MissCalico: blog

June 20, 2009

The Great Arnica Experiment

Filed under: arnica, bruises, caning, for science, marks — Calico @ 12:58 am
Arnica cream

Arnica cream

Last summer, I put my body on the line for science: I wanted to test the efficacy of topical arnica montana.  We’ve all heard that arnica makes bruises go away faster.  I wanted to believe it, because I could really use it, but I am an enormous skeptic when it comes to alternative medicine. Actually, you could end that sentence after “skeptic”.

The effective methods I know are preventative: ice, elevate, and avoid aspirin. Bruises go away on their own, and much faster if you have been bruised repeatedly in the same place. If there were a miracle bruise cure, I’m pretty sure it would be under patent by Pfizer or Merck and cost much more than six or eight dollars a tube.  Blindly applying sticky herbal-smelling bruise cream three times a day to no effect was not doing it for me.

I would have just ignored the stuff, save my rampant annoyance at being assured it works and would solve all my problems. Anecdotal evidence, psssh. How do you actually know it works? How do you know your bruises wouldn’t have gone away that fast anyway?  Have you heard, by any chance, that homeopathy is an utter crock of shit?

I decided I’d conduct my own experiment: I’d make two identical bruises and use arnica on one. I admit this experiment was, perhaps, lacking in scientific rigor, but not devoid of entertainment value.

arnica experiment, day 2

arnica experiment, day 2

First, symmetry! I drew 4″ circles on both thighs and instructed my helpers to stay inside them. The resulting thigh-eating blobs are a great illustration in how bruises spread. If you look at the photo, you can sort of see the circle I drew (filled with cane marks), the pad of swelling underneath it, and then the pink-purple edges of the thing bleeding out.

The right bruise was a little smaller, so I decided I’d give the arnica a head start and keep the left leg as my control.

Bruises, of course, are subject to gravity too. Over the course of the next few days, they crept down my legs almost to my knees, preventing me from wearing shorts. Did arnica stop that? Noooooo.

I meant to take photos of the bruises every day, but I couldn’t get adequate light, and the pictures didn’t come out.  So you’ll have to take my word for it that after a week of using arnica three times a day, the results were unimpressive. I couldn’t tell any difference at all. They faded out after a week and a half, looking identical to the end.

Ten days is fast for a bruise of that gruesomeness. I’m sure if I’d used arnica on both, I’d have wholly credited the healing time to the stuff.

Technically, this doesn’t prove that arnica doesn’t work. But it fails to prove that it does work, either.

If you conduct your own experiment, please send me a link, or just email me the photos and any narrative! I would be delighted beyond measure to post it here.

June 18, 2009

ass to mouth

Filed under: anal sex, ass-to-mouth, intersec, twitter — Calico @ 12:19 pm

SW called me on my dangling tags in the last post: I was writing about The Beautiful Kind’s awesome and yet disgusting post on ass to mouth.  She recruited a “sexy microbiologist” (who doesn’t want one of those?) who swabbed his mouth, ass, and genital skin, and cultured what he found…

ass culture. no really.

ass culture. no really.

While I think I am less squicked by bodily fluids than most, this still got to me.  Once I got done making faces and shaking my head, I had to post it. (via Figleaf)

Guess what I did the last time I had sex? Yes. Yes, that. In my defense, it was as squeaky clean as ass-to-mouth ever gets.  Didn’t even taste like lube. (I don’t care how nice your sheets are, if you put a lube-covered cock in my mouth, spitting on them is totally fair game.)

The other picture I need for this post is me blogging, with the caption “TMI: No Wonder You’re Not Getting Laid”.

I’m actually in bed with my laptop right now, waiting for PD & crew to be ready to shoot.  I’m still sick with last week’s headcold.  I think whatever I coughed up this morning was alive.

At least Twitter assures me I’m not alone in hating the Celebrator:

DiaZerva @misscalico I’d rather be cattle prodded 100 times than take the Celebrator.. that thing is evil & put me on the verge of tears. OUCH!

June 17, 2009

logic & porn

Filed under: aim, anal sex, armchair politics, ass-to-mouth, condoms, porn, safer sex, testing, ttoo, vibrators — Calico @ 10:35 pm

The more I read about testing in mainstream porn the more I realize I didn’t know. Dacia, Satine Phoenix, Courtney Trouble, Jiz Lee and others are all weighing in.

With TTOO on my schedule, people have started asking me if I’m finally going to consider mainstream boy/girl porn. No way, unless I can use condoms.

I don’t even know if I’d want to do more porn than I already do. Worrying about bacterial vaginosis, yeast infections, unclean fingernails — it takes a toll on my sex life.  Add the worry of STDs and I’d never get laid. Not to mention (although this is less of a thing in mainstream porn), more of those vibrators that women just love, all women, don’t I know that women love vibrators? — I don’t even have enough curse words for them.

Right now I am nurturing a special hate for the Celebrator, which feels exactly like having your clit scrubbed with a toothbrush. When I visited the website in preparation for a healthy rant, I found that it actually IS a toothbrush — you remove the brush head and replace it with the special Celebrator tip. My clit is sore in an entirely new way, tender and raw, like it’s been sandpapered. I’d ask who thought this was a good idea, but I know the answer well by now: women love these things. All women. *eyeroll*

You can’t refute that logic.  Oh, and no one ever chooses to have sex with a condom.

June 15, 2009

rumor control

Filed under: Uncategorized — Calico @ 5:20 pm

It’s dry reading material, but in light of an LA porn performer’s recent HIV result (and the resulting panic), I want to do some basic rumor control.  I’m simply amazed at the amount of misinformation and hysteria that passes for reporting.

For today’s episode of Rumor vs. Fact, I’ve excerpted from this excellent essay by Ernest Greene.

RUMOR: 16 Hidden HIV Infections! AIM a conspiracy!

FACT: False. Despite much misreporting, it’s one contained case.

… none of Fielding’s cynical machinations sinks to the level of his false assertion, trumpeted by The Times, that AIM has “concealed” an additional 16 HIV infections in the industry since 2004. In fact, eleven of those cases involved male performers in gay porn who are not part of AIM’s client base and who do not test with AIM and four were private citizens not affiliated with porn who sought testing at AIM for personal reasons. As required by law, all HIV infections detected by AIM were reported to Fielding’s department, which is how he comes to know about them, but were not disclosed to AIM’s heterosexual porn industry clients because they did not involve het porn in any way. And yet The Times reported this deliberate and heinous distortion of the truth under the blaring headline: “More Porn HIV Cases Disclosed.” In point of fact, there is no way AIM, Fielding or anyone else can know that the cases involving the gay performers were porn-related, as AIM does not monitor that population.

Relatedly:

RUMOR: The names of the actors need to be released publicly! AIM is not cooperating with authorities by withholding them.

FACT: False.  People calling for the names of the infected actors are crazy.  Why, to shame them? To ruin their names? I don’t need to know who they are, as long as I’m not working with them.  And thanks to AIM, I’m not.

RUMOR: Porn performers are a risk to the public!

FACT: Actually, when it comes to HIV, the public is a risk to porn performers.  HIV cases come from outside our pool.

It is still much, much safer to have barrier-free sex with a tested porn performer than with a stranger met in a bar, but porn performers themselves have been known to have barrier-free sex with strangers met in bars. Porn performers do not represent a threat to the health of the citizenry of California as Dr. Fielding would have us believe. It’s the other way around. Outsiders with unknown histories pose a threat to our well-observed community.

This risk is impossible to gauge and impossible to eliminate entirely, short of keeping performers locked up between shoots, an idea that would probably get some traction with Fielding, Kerndt, Fryer, Weinstein and the rest of their gang.

This is what they do in Nevada brothels: lock the women up between tests.  Have we mentioned that clients, of course, are neither tested nor quarantined?  It denies protection to sex workers that clients are guaranteed.  I think it’s inhumane.  But I digress.

Also — is it just me, or does an isolated HIV case not only suggest but require that the source was not a performer?

RUMOR: We should just make porn without condoms illegal!

FACT: This is the most complicated bit, but in my opinion, the most interesting.  If Greene is right, it can’t be done through law without preventing testing and the privilege of refusal to work with HIV+ performers.

Ernest Greene tells us the trainwreck story of regulation:

… Cal-OSHA’s plan for porn would be the means through which it [condom regulation] would have to be put in place. Cal-OSHA has jurisdiction only over employees. Independent contractors, which is how porn performers not under contract to specific companies, are currently classed under state law, would not be subject to Cal-OSHA supervision unless reclassified as employees.

So what, you might ask, is so bad about that? After all, it would make them eligible for workman’s comp and provide them with a mechanism for reporting unsafe working conditions on the set.

There’s just one little hitch in this plan. It is against the law in California for any employer to require an HIV test, or even to ask about a potential employee’s HIV status, as a condition of employment. Doing so is considered employment discrimination and carries significant penalties to the employer.

In fact, if performers were considered employees rather than contractors, it would be illegal for a producer to hire a performer on the grounds that said performer was, in fact, HIV positive. That’s right. Producers would be required to hire HIV+ performers, and if other performers didn’t like working with them, those performers would be fired while the HIV+ performers would be allowed to remain on the set until partners could be found who would work with them.

Well, fuck.  We already have a condom-only, no-testing model in gay porn and it has been much less successful than het porn at preventing HIV.  Greene, quoting a gay porn producer, writes: “it’s just assumed that all of our talent is or will be infected and that the use of barriers is a secondary precaution.”

Did you know?  I had no idea that condom use in het porn was so rare and so discouraged.  I feel … sheltered.  Clarisse Thorn writes that my generation may not practice perfect safe sex, but we do believe we should, and I agree.  Condom use is one “should” I am willing to live with.

June 14, 2009

june announcements

Filed under: las vegas, sex blogger calendar, stripping, swa, tesfest, the training of o — Calico @ 3:00 am

I’m having blogger’s block. :(

In actual news:

The NYC Sexblogger Calendar is gearing up for a second year of supporting Sex Work Awareness — the organization that does the Speak Up media training — and I’m going to be in it!  While we’re getting sexy for the cause, here’s how you can help:

  • Sponsor a month.  Got an Internet business you would like to advertise? This is for you!
  • Buy a day. Promote your blog, commemorate a date or just save your birthday.
  • Preorder a calendar!

I leave tomorrow for a few days of shooting upstate. Woo, shooting!

June 20-30th, I’m dancing/vacationing in Las Vegas. If you are interested in shooting, or know someone who might be, please let me know. I will post details about dancing as I know ‘em.  Referral slip from the club, work card from the sheriff, Nevada business license… Oy.

July 1-4th, I’m presenting at TESFest.

July 13-17, I’m shooting for The Training of O. I’ve been fantasizing about this site since it opened two years ago, and when I got the booking I might have jumped up and down and squealed a little. It may not be the Marketplace, but it’s close enough for me.

June 3, 2009

bottoms off

Filed under: amateur, boston, nude, sex work, stripping — Calico @ 2:25 am

I arrived in Boston to discover I’d been signed for an amateur night contest at the strip club.  While I’ve been stripping in New York for months, which might seem unfair to the actual amateurs, I’m not a real stripper — deep do the rivers of denial flow — and I panicked.  What do I wear?  But I’ve never done floorwork!  What if it’s all these supercute college girls with big boobs?  You promise they won’t boo me off stage?

In the end, the contest didn’t run.  I stayed to audition for a job.  A large man with a fetching mustache took me up to the VIP room and asked me to dance two songs.  This I could do, and I mounted the platform with confidence unto smugness.  Not even a minute later I was putting my clothes back and promising to be back tomorrow at six.

Working at this club would be my first time dancing fully nude.  If it were up to me, I would work in panties to save energy on shaving, but I wondered whether working bottomless would be “liberating”. (It wasn’t.)

While waiting for the contest to be called, I sat and watched the dancers.  The experienced strippers moved just the same here. There was some kneeling and crawling, which was new to me, as it is largely banned on Manhattan stages.  The girls exhibited a familiar “conservation of energy” that led one movement smoothly into the next, without a second’s hesitation or wasted momentum. They, too, had done this before.

May 13, 2009

The Craigslist shutdown is not the answer

The news currently tracking across my (liberal, sex-worker-heavy) Twitter feeds is immensely frustrating: Craigslist is shutting down its Erotic Services section, under orders of Connecticut’s Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. This represents a complete lack of awareness and responsibility, and in the place of the action sex workers have been longing to see, it is maddening.

It seems like a response to the recent, highly publicized attacks on sex workers who were advertising through Craigslist. Markoff probably targeted sex workers like Julia Brisbane because they seemed like easy targets: isolated by stigma from friends and family, unlikely to have recourse to the law, and even if they did, unlikely to receive fair and sympathetic treatment. The more press coverage the issue got, the more it seemed like there might be action to help stop this sort of crime. Now, there’s finally action, and it’s being wasted on mistaken and harmful directives.

As a sex worker I’ve rarely advertised on Erotic Services, but I’ve used Craigslist’s Casual Encounters recreationally. I mention it because that came under scrutiny too when news anchor George Weber was murdered. It’s not just a women’s issue. And you know what, it’s not even a sex issue! A Minnesota woman who answered a babysitting ad was murdered through Craigslist too.

Oh my god, it’s a Craigslist issue then! No. It’s a “murdering fuckwad” issue. Craigslist did not kill these people. Murderers killed these people.

It’s true that Craigslist is a major advertising venue, for prostitutes but also sex workers of all kinds: the largest in the nation. Its loss will have a distinct effect on the people who use it. Here’s how it works: we advertise to attract the clients we want, and screen to eliminate the clients we don’t, but the number of clients we need stays the same. Anything that hurts our methods of attracting clients, like the shutdown of Erotic Services, will affect how stringent our screening can afford to be. It’s pretty clear to me that Craigslist has just made its sex workers more marginalized and more at risk.

Now, Craigslist has no responsibility to provide an advertising venue. But if Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is trying to make sex workers safer, he’s going about it all wrong. He doesn’t need to protect us from ourselves, or from our clients. He needs to protect us from criminals.

Julia Brisbane’s death was not her fault.

Seriously. I’d think this was obvious, but apparently it’s not. NO ONE ASKS TO BE MURDERED. No one asks to be assaulted, robbed or raped, either.

It’s like that old question: How can men help stop rape? They can stop raping women. Trite, but true. How do we stop crime against sex workers? We stop criminals from committing crime. We don’t tell people to stop being sex workers.

On the face of it maybe the Attorney General is dumb enough to think this will work. If there are two elements to crime against sex workers — criminals and sex workers — then removing either one will solve it, right? But the problem is that crime against sex workers doesn’t stop there. There are two principles at work here:

Sex work is never, ever going away. It doesn’t matter what you think about its current forms: the ability to decide why to have sex is an inseparable part of reproductive freedom. It will exist as long as people control their bodies and dictate the terms of access.

Sex worker rights are human rights. No matter what you think about the existence of sex work, all sex workers are people and all people — in the eyes of criminals and sometimes even the law — are potential sex workers. Rights denied to sex workers are rights that can be denied to anybody else. As long as people are harming sex workers, “innocent” people are going to fall by the wayside.

I got an upsetting email a few days ago, asking for my “bad date list” contacts (which it turns out are sadly limited). A woman he knew had been brutally raped, and he thought that because the attackers called her a whore, they were targeting sex workers. I doubt it. I think they were probably just calling her a whore because it was their word for a woman they wanted to dehumanize.

Take away the real whores, and you don’t remove the criminals and their hatred, or their search for an easy target. In fact, the darlings of the AG’s theory — the innocents who’ve never traded sex for money — are going to start to get it in our stead. (Not that they don’t already.) Is that what Blumenthal really wants?

There is a solution here: stop telling sex workers not to use the Internet. Stop telling us not to have sex. Stop telling us not to have the nerve to charge for it. And start protecting us. The AG is missing the point, and that is a tragic epitaph to hang on another woman’s death.

EDIT: Some related posts:

Breaking: Craigslist to end Erotic Services << Bound Not Gagged

Waking Vixen: PRESS RELEASE: “Erotic Services” Denied: Craigslist and Attorneys General Are Putting Sex Workers At Risk

Salon: Craigslist Xes Out Sex Ads

May 12, 2009

Building Bridges at Sex 2.0

Filed under: Sex 2.0, activism, armchair politics, research, sex work — Calico @ 8:20 pm

Building bridges and alliances between sex worker communities, researchers & clients

We acknowledge from the start that these categories (sex worker, researcher, client) are not monolithic, and that they contain overlapping segments with individuals belonging to more than one category with varying degrees of openness. In order to advance the cause of sex worker rights these communities need to collaborate, yet collaboration is made difficult by distrust (often earned by researchers who have not taken the time to learn how to be allies). There are excellent examples of working alliances, and we’ll discuss how those examples serve as models for other collaborations that can, over time, help reduce the distrust that has made good research, good policy, and good outreach difficult. Collaborative spaces exist online and offline, and ideally participants in these spaces interact as equals, each being recognized for the specific knowledge and skill they contribute.
Session leaders: Elizabeth Wood & Renegade Evolution

“Sex Work in the Time of Obama” at Sex 2.0

Filed under: Sex 2.0, activism, armchair politics, sex work, trafficking — Calico @ 8:07 pm

From the Sex 2.0 website:

Now that the United States has a new administration, sex workers and their allies are facing different challenges. In this session we ask (and attempt to answer): what should sex worker activists and allies be working toward with the new administration, and how can the average internet sex geek help? This discussion will be a strategy discussion about the messaging we feel the Obama Administration is most receptive to, the various points of entry within the Obama Admin (such as the new White House Council on Women and Girls, etc) and most specifically, map out a viral messaging campaign proposal to bring to the community. This session will plant a seed to advance online and new media collaboration, split up some of the work and identify tasks that can be delegated to various groups/activists who want to be active but aren’t sure what steps to take.

Session leaders: Stacey Swimme & Audacia Ray.

“Revenge Porn” with Maria Diaz at Sex 2.0

Filed under: Sex 2.0, activism, armchair politics, feminism, porn — Calico @ 4:25 am

This is the first of the video I recorded at Sex 2.0. This session is in two parts because, due to technical difficulties, it’s missing a chunk in the middle. Sorry Maria! For more, you can see Figleaf’s notes and Maria Diaz’s post about Sex 2.0.

May 1, 2009

not for the “challenge” or the “risk”

Filed under: Uncategorized — Calico @ 8:09 pm

This was too perfect not to share. My top from Atlanta (who I will, hopefully, resist the urge to address in a tight spot as Mr. Snappy Rubber Bands) gave me permission to repost this from an email. Italics and minor editing are mine.

I did find figleaf’s comment a little off the mark. I don’t think it is at all about testing oneself. What is to test? We go to huge lengths to set it up so you don’t have a choice in the matter. You are going to stay tied to the chair and accept whatever I want to do to you. You don’t have to pass the test to do that. You literally cannot fail. Nor is mountain climbing a concept of being without control or surrendering. I would suggest it is exactly the opposite. The climber is doing their best to remain in control. I have not done any climbing of any magnitude, but I don’t think “the thrill” of climbing is anything like the emotional place you go into when I torture you. Neither during nor after, do I think it is the same.

Finally … our psyches provide us with a unique opportunity in SM play. We have the opportunity to experience the “feeling” associated with many extreme activities without risking much at all. I actually think what we simulate is not the thrill of conquering a hard climb as much as the terror associated with falling. We just don’t have to deal with what happens at the end of a fall.

This is my disagreement with the extreme sports = BDSM analogy. If you’re into extreme sports, you will be very disappointed with BDSM. No one actually gets hurt.  It’s not terribly risky.  And then we want to dress up in strange outfits and have sex afterward.

Super Awesome Reader Question on Consensual Non-Consent

Filed under: cnc, consent, feminism, issues, young and confused — Calico @ 1:08 am

Like Bad Man, I’d like to avoid being thought of as the typical barbarian male, but I’ll admit when I finished reading the original post, I had a similar question in mind. Not so much “did you come”, but “why is that enjoyable” or “why would you choose to do that”. I guess, for me, I can understand and have experienced slight pain increasing the intensity of arousal. In contrast, what you described in nylons and duct tape seems qualitatively different. I think what drove that home for me was when you wrote “but during, I would rather be somewhere (oh, God, anywhere) else.”

I think I have a hard time understanding both how the anticipation and the remembrance of the event pays for the experience, even setting aside my confusion over how the anticipation and memory would be exciting instead of terrifying or disturbing. The closest I think I can come to similar experiences in my own life is feeling proud I got through something that was tough for me, but I think that’s a very poor analogue to what you’re describing. (I also don’t enjoy roller coasters, most scary movies, or anything else that people seem to enjoy for the rush, so that may be why I have such a difficult time understanding.)

I don’t know if it’s possible to, or if you’d want to, help me understand that, but any info you could pass along would be appreciated.

(Last side note: I hope I managed to phrase everything in as non-judgmental a way as possible as I certainly don’t want to give the impression that I think that my incomprehension is anyone’s problem other than my own. I’m just hoping to get help to understand a bit better.)

-BP

This is a super-awesome question, and you are the very model of tact! Your disclaimer makes me afraid I come off like a neo-feminist ball-kicking bitch. It’s true, I have kicked a few testicles in my day, but their owners all asked for it very nicely.

I like a little playful smacking around as much as the next person, but you’re right, I would hazard to say that was different. It’s not really about the pain — the pain is just a tool. We were trying to create a situation where he could really, actually force me. How to stage nonconsent without actual harm or violation? Pain.

I do it because I like it. But I don’t know why I like it.

Years ago, I remember trying to explain BDSM to my sister as an erotic fascination with fantasy. She said “That’s all very well and good, but why the fuck do you have to act it out?” I still haven’t figured that out. I use words like “fascination” and “compulsion”. I say I’m “just wired that way” and I’m a “fetishist”. Then again, no one has ever asked me why I want to put a penis in my vagina — that seems to be a pretty normal fascination and compulsion. Maybe BDSM doesn’t need examination, either.

We had a mutual fantasy. Standing in the way of that fantasy were the small problems of autonomy and consent. :) No problem: with enough pain, we could create that fantasy briefly as a lived reality.

How do I reconcile the foreknowledge? Consensual nonconsent is an unsolvable, crazy dichotomy. I know that at the moment it happens, it is going to suck and I am going to hate it. I know when it happens, I will lose perspective and I will lose presence of mind. It’s scary and it’s real. Every time. But it has to be or it’s not worth doing. Unlike the prick of a injection or an ear piercing, that I experience this as unbearable is part and parcel of its appeal.

And that turns me on. The whole thing turns me on.

When I think about it beforehand it’s like video, coming in starts and stops. I am heady with the anticipation of that rush when I realize I am fucked and he is going to keep on going. That moment is a little like coming. But when I try to picture how much it will really hurt in my head, the video cuts to static. I can’t visualize it. It’s like the falling dream where I always wake up just before I get dashed on the rocks. Humans aren’t meant to remember pain very well.

I don’t know why this stuff turns me on. I just know it does. And aside from my vague concerns about the patriarchy, I also know I spend an inordinate amount of time, energy and money chasing it. I used to think that if I figured out why I wanted it, I wouldn’t need to do it anymore. If I ever figure it out, I’ll let you know.

April 30, 2009

“Fetish Businesses” and the new TNG

Filed under: TES, business, tng — Calico @ 10:58 pm

I didn’t talk for the first couple of rounds of the panel because of the CRUSHING NEGATIVITY. People kept saying “There’s no way to make money selling your fetish”. “Kinksters are cheap.” That’s obviously untrue. There are plenty of ways, because people are doing it. Even me.

Of course, that puts me in a position to say: even if you make money selling that thing you love to do, it probably won’t be with the person you love to do it with, at the time you love to do it, in the setting… etc, etc.

The first thing you should do is ask yourself: why do you want to make your fetish into a business? Do you want to evangelize and show the word that your marginalized fetish exists? Do you want to open conversations with other fetishists like you? Do you want to provide quality porn or products for people like you? Do you want to be a pornographer, and act in or direct videos? Do you want to become an authority figure on your kink? Do you want to enjoy some Internet notoriety?

Then ask yourself, how best can you achieve that? It might not involve monetizing it.

Maybe you’d be better served by running a popular site with free pictures and keeping your day job to pay for it. Or by running a website that pays for itself, your equipment, and your models if not much else. Or by running two websites — one mainstream, to pay the bills and establish your “professional authority”, and one for the love of it

During circle the conversation turned to the composition of the TNG group (18-35 age range), which I pointed out, wasn’t very TNG at all. I tried not to be rude, but I’m afraid there’s no way to say “It would be nice to have more young people” — even in a space designated for young people — without making the older people feel snubbed.

“We’ve tried to have TNG-age presenters, but they all flake on us.” “They say, build it and they will come; we built it and they’re not coming.” “What if you just brought a couple of your friends? That would make all the difference! Why don’t you do some of the work?” “Yeah, where are your friends?”

I can only think the same thing I do about business. If your demographic isn’t buying, don’t get mad at them — fix your product. Or ask some even more radical questions. Blaming TNGers isn’t working, so maybe it’s time to try something new.

two quick clips

Filed under: activism, armchair politics, kink dot com, sex work — Calico @ 2:41 pm

I Am A Sex Worker. (1:07) A PSA by Audacia Ray and all of us from the Speak Up! workshop.

My very first attempt at video with the new Flip (1:57). I pan around my Kink.com model dorm room and chat about how ridiculous I find the Matt Smith SFWeekly.com article. The link goes to a response by Violet Blue, to whom I’d much rather give the traffic. (How tired was I?  There was a more lucid version of the audio, but I realized when I played back the video that I was not wearing pants.)

April 29, 2009

“Fetish Business” panel at TES, Sex 2.0

Filed under: Sex 2.0, TES, presenting — Calico @ 3:24 pm

Tonight I am on a panel at TES.

TES

If you’re 35 or under, please come join us!  Here is the description:

TES TNG Presents: A Fetish Business Panel (Open to attendees ages 18-35 and their guests) There is a saying that the difference between a job and a career is doing the thing you love, so why not get paid for indulging your fetish? This panel discussion will focus on honing your craft into something others would pay you for, with panelists specializing in modeling, photography, and fetish businesses. Members $4; Non-Members $8

260 W. 36th Street - 3rd Floor
Between 7th & 8th Ave

I didn’t realize it was a TNG meeting, but that’s a little exciting, even though I seem to be the only panelist in the age range.

On May 9, I’ll be in Washington, DC for Sex 2.0.

lips_date_200

Here is their press release:

The second Sex 2.0 to focus on the intersection of social media, feminism and sexuality

WASHINGTON, D.C. - April 27, 2009. Now in our second year, Sex 2.0, a one-day unconference, will take place on May 9, 2009 in Washington, D.C. Sex 2.0 will focus on the intersection of social media, feminism, and sexuality. How is social media enabling people to learn, grow, and connect sexually? How is sexual expression tied to social activism? Does the concept of transparency online offer new opportunities or present new roadblocks — or both?  Sex 2.0 is an unconference, which means that sessions will be informal conversations organized by people attending the event. Session leaders with some knowledge in a subject area facilitate conversations among the participants.

Sessions will include: “Internet Advocacy for Sexual Freedom” with Ricci Joy Levy of the Woodhull Foundation; “Polyamory in Media’s Spotlight” with Anita Wagner; “Craigslist Red, Craigslist Blue: Why we should dismantle the “internet red light district” with Melissa Gira Grant and Joanne McNeill;  “Kick Ass Twitter Apps” with Cunning Minx; “Revenge Porn” with Maria Diaz; and “Sex Writing Beyond Erotica, Beyond Porn” with Jack Murnighan, Nerve.com editor-at-large. The keynote speaker will be Nikol Hasler, creator of the Midwest Teen Sex Show (http://midwestteensexshow.com). A complete list of sessions may be viewed at: http://sex20con.com/2009-schedule/sessions/

Sex 2.0 will be held in a Washington, D.C. hotel. (To ensure everyone’s privacy, location information will be email once you are registered). It will offer five conference rooms, a lounge (with free WiFi), vendor area as well as space for various sex-positive outreach groups to set up informational displays and tables.

The event is managed by volunteers and funded by sponsors. We are pleased to have SEXTOY.com as our presenting sponsor this year. SEXTOY.com has been focusing on building a relationship within the blogger community with the recent start-up of its sex toy reviewer program. SEXTOY.com is honored to be the official sponsor for Sex 2.0 and looks forward to a mutually rewarding relationship with the blogger Community.  Two SEXTOY.com associates will be attending Sex 2.0 this year: Erik Van Riper and Domina Doll; who both look forward to meeting everyone, attending the talks and participating in discussions. Sex 2.0 is also pleased to have community sponsor Bound Not Gagged (www.boundnotgagged.com), hospitality sponsor Kimberleecline.com and technology sponsor PosAlt.com supporting this years conference.

While the event itself is on Saturday, May 9, there are participant-organized meetups, outings, and parties being planned for Friday night and Saturday evening, as well as a Sunday brunch. For more information, visit the Sex 2.0 website at www.sex20con.com or follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/sex20con.

April 25, 2009

firsts (and seconds and thirds)

Filed under: Uncategorized — Calico @ 4:40 pm

For Friday’s shoot, wardrobe dressed me up as a cheerleader.

“It’s not porn without sneakers,” I sighed, resigning myself to being typecast once again as the girl next door.

Harmony Rose and Lorelei Lee got grown-up clothes: two elegant cocktail dresses. We looked at each other and were stumped.

“You guys are having a cocktail party and I knock at the door fundraising?” I suggested. “You’re my mother’s friends and I come home late? Wait, that’s wrong, but awesome.”

“We get drunk and decide to crash the football game?” suggested Harmony.

“A football game… with no football players and one cheerleader?” I said, dubious.

I have plenty of experience fundraising (Thin Mints, anyone?), but the roleplay was incidental. When the two of them started taking off their clothes, inviting me to look, I was speechless.

They shoved me in a box at the end of that scene and accidentally locked it. Commence panic outside and much amusement inside. The key turned out to be right on the side of the box. It’s nice to know the professionals mess up too.

With no further technical difficulties, they proceeded to fuck me senseless. Incredibly, Lorelei even fisted me — a first for me, on the receiving end. I cannot believe I have been missing out on this.

That was the first half of my day. I had put myself back together and was heading out the door for my date that night when Matt Williams peeked in my door. “Calico?”

“Yeah, hi, what’s up?”

“Do you want to wrestle?”

“Uh, now?”

“Yeah.”

A beat. I was still holding the phone. “Let me call my date back?”

Twenty minutes later, I had put my date on the guest list, and was on the mat for my second shoot of the day: a live four-girl wrestling match (with Isis Love, Vendetta, and Claire Dames). I’m beginning to accept that I will never wrestle anyone of my weight and inexperience. In one of the night’s more entertaining moments, Vendetta choked me out with my own arm. Then in the winner’s round, Isis fisted me again, just for good measure. My patient date found the whole business highly amusing.

After all the girl fisting he was curious to see if he could do it. Conclusion: boy-on-girl fisting is possible, but not as well engineered. By that point I was delirious and pretty much everything felt good, even the things that didn’t, and we proceeded to fuck until I had crescent-moon bite marks on the insides of my arms, from covering my mouth to keep from screaming.

Now I’m off to find new luggage and make an appearance at Kinky Salon before my flight back to New York. I’m very ready for this semester to be over.

How has sex work changed me?

Kitty, in response to a movie she watched, wrote this post for me.

…the idea that sex workers cannot love/have intimate relationships because of their personal issues, generally implied to have been brought about by work. Let me share what has been affected by my work-

-I suspect my lovers tend to consider me the girl you have fun kinky sex with, but not someone you get emotionally attached to, because I’m a sex worker (and also polyamorous, but that’s another blog).

Hmm. I think this is true for me, although not necessarily because I’m a sex worker.  There are so many reasons I am “not someone you get emotionally attached to”, I couldn’t even try to isolate one.

-sometimes I get selfish about what I want sexually because my work is about focusing on other people getting off… or sometimes I don’t want sex at all because I’m starved for other intimacies.

-sometimes work gets me crazy turned on and I want a lot more sex! Sometimes I want a followup session to my work sessions.

It’s work, yo, but it’s also sex.

-often I want more head petting and affection. I’ve found myself also drawn a lot more to the submissive play I do with G- I think the catharsis is helpful, somehow.

-I end up needing to date people who are happy to hear about other relationships, otherwise, I can’t bitch about work!

They’re work relationships, but they’re still relationships.

-I’ve found I enjoy keeping a few types of kinky play just between me and my lovers, not with clients, so there are some “special”, “just us” stuff.

I don’t tend to reserve activities — in fact, I usually seek out the same activities through sex work that I seek with my lovers — but it is a common way to keep boundaries. (For a more nuanced discussion of boundaries in porn, I recommend this excellent interview with Lorelei Lee.)

While I have never had sex with a man on camera, I dislike all my reasons (mostly, the objections of my male partners) not to have sex with men on camera. Sample conversation from last time I was in San Francisco:

Lochai: You don’t do boy/girl, right? Why not?

Me, half-jokingly: Because no one will ever love me.

Him: So don’t!

Me: That is not what I was hoping you would say.

-I’ve more vocal in bed about what I like and don’t like, and negotiate better in general- if I’m not having my needs acknowledged, I expect to at least be getting paid.

Oh, yes. I think I often unfairly call this selfishness in myself, because it takes my partners aback. But I think it is SO HOT and so necessary when people — especially women — give it to me! If we don’t expect women to be vocal, this causes no end of problems, not least the passive construction of consent. Whatever happened to active desire? Let’s change this.

That’s some of it. I’m sure there’s more, maybe I’ll add to it as I go along. But no, being a sex worker doesn’t mean you have to be less emotionally intimate with lovers. Maybe it does if you want monogamous partnership. Not been my experience though! We’re people, not exclusively fantasy objects, and as such we have our own needs and lives. Why wouldn’t we just due to our jobs?

Huzzah, etc.

I tried to write this article about a year ago, but didn’t post because I got bogged down in defensiveness. Sex work has very few (if any) truly unique evils. It is a little microcosm that fosters and concentrates what is icky about sexuality and gender in the world at large. I’m OK with any changes that awareness might bring me. It’s not “damage”; it’s knowledge, and ignorance couldn’t be farther from bliss.

Sex workers, would you add anything to this list? How has sex work changed you?

April 20, 2009

Did you come?

Filed under: bad sex, issues, orgasms — Calico @ 11:26 pm

There’s a really prevalent (and I think male, and thus heterocentric) expectation that sex is all about orgasm. Sex is something a woman might want for herself, but that she does for her man (Cosmo language usage intentional): it isn’t over when she comes (although she’d better if she ever wants him to stop pumping away, because he’s a feminist, damn it), it’s over when the man comes.

Outlining this did give me rather unpleasant flashbacks to laying on my back in a frat house, staring at the ceiling and wondering whether I needed to refill the gas tank in my car. I mean… wow, like, I’m seriously squicked.

I got on the topic when Fet left a comment on my last smut post, asking whether I came, and why or why not:

… Apparently you enjoyed the experience, even without orgasming - so one would infer that orgasm was not integral to the experience.

At this point it deserved a little more than a “well, duh”, so I went off on memory lane.  I don’t blame him (her? it?) for squicking me. It just hasn’t been long enough since I was 19.

Nowadays, I much prefer to live in my bubble of openmindedness, where we define sex almost as broadly as the NYPD.

I feel a Figleaf quote coming on. Here, he quotes Em and Lo of Daily Bedpost:

“We’ve said it before, we’ll say it again: Sex is not intercourse. So stop using the two words interchangeably! When we as a society do this over and over again, it gets into the collective unconscious and starts limiting how we imagine the possibilities of pleasure, especially for women. A majority of women (that’s more women than not!) don’t climax from intercourse, so why rush to get there when you can spend time on more rewarding acts? But make no mistake: it’s not like you gentlemen out there can’t enjoy the variety that comes from taking intercourse off its pedestal–hey, if the destination is orgasm, how could anyone complain about the journey there? (Indeed, how could anyone NOT call that “sex”?!)”

Read the quote in context here.

Nicely, if heteronormatively**, said. I always like to go a bit further, though, and stress that “sex,” however you define it, also doesn’t automatically end with male ejaculation.

This is not, by the way, to buy into the idea that orgasms are just “harder” for women, or that women “need” foreplay. After all the “fore” in foreplay is short for the same old “before intercourse to male ejaculation” Em, Lo, all other right-thinking people, and I are trying to nudge out of first place.

Instead, as Em and Lo hint, if the point of sex was male ejaculation then “Jizz in My Pants” would be an instructional video and we could all go home.

Once I stopped snickering I noticed that I even like his footnote.

**Focusing on heterosexuality is just fine in this context, because for reasons that don’t actually have as much to do with *sex* as it does with notions of *reproduction*, heterosexual sex seems to be a lot more consistently… even *institutionally*!… and *unnecessarily* dysfunctional.

I know it can be hard to imagine choosing to have a sexual experience without orgasm. But I bet most people do at some point. Have you ever had sex that was so intense that you forgot to come? Or couldn‘t come? Didn’t want it to end, so you stopped yourself from coming? Were too tired from your glorious exertions, too distracted by your partner, or too contented to bother?

Orgasms are great. But I can have orgasms anytime (and frequently do.) There’s other stuff to do, too!

One last Figleaf quote, since he posted something topical only four hours ago:

Oh, and finally, there are any number of people in kink who don’t care for or even actively dislike, say, being beaten black and blue while it’s happening, who nevertheless get off hard in anticipation, on recollection, or both.

Very cute.  I’m a fan of both.

What Speak Up! did for me

Filed under: Uncategorized — Calico @ 12:15 am

I came out of Saturday’s Speak Up! Media Training for the Empowered Sex Worker with one simple, sweeping revelation: I am in charge of my message.

A couple months ago Audacia Ray, one of the day’s two trainers, spoke at KinkForAll and said something that made me sit right up: “Damn right I have an agenda.” Of course I have an agenda, too: everyone has one, especially the media. An agenda is not a bad thing, and what’s more, it’s necessary.

Our first exercise: How do we get from this powerful, inarticulate drive we all share to messages we can express? From there, we could move on the core of Speak Up: what can we do to make sure our messages stand up to disinterested, distorting, or actively destructive media interactions?

It was an emotional day for me, not least because we did our first ‘message’ exercise on the recent murder of a masseuse in Boston. I am a decent persuasive writer, but I started to realize my ignorance as we sorted through supporting arguments. (Would mentioning “arrests” arouse sympathy, or would “violence” be a better choice? Can you back up the statement “Sex work is like any other job”? Is the word “screening” insider jargon?)

The toughest part for me was when we ran mock interviews with an antagonistic “reporter”. I didn’t do so well. My mood nosedived as I pushed back against questions like “Why do you think women feel the need to prostitute themselves like this on Craigslist?”  There was palpable frustration as we slumped back in our seats to review the videos.  After a morning of pre-interview prep, I wasn’t feeling particularly “empowered” — more like “despondent”.

“Did anyone interrupt the reporter, or ask her a question?” Audacia asked. Holy shit. One woman had, and while we listened to her tape, I grew increasingly excited. I had been fending off the “reporter”’s rude and prying inquiries about whether I was a prostitute (I’m not, at least for these purposes, and neither was the victim), how much money I made (I’m not a prostitute!), how I would screen my clients (Don’t you see, it’s not about watching our drinks and the length of our skirts, it’s about men not killing women!).

And I’d been waiting those endless three minutes for my reporter to ask the question, waiting for the one that would let me tell her everything I thought about this woman’s death and the insulting tragedy of the media coverage: waiting for permission. But this was a conversation. Conversations went two ways. I could ask her questions, instead of just defending myself! I don’t need anyone’s permission to speak, any more than I need to answer them when they ask. Oh my God, I could have vibrated right out of my seat.

We even talked about image. As much thought as I had put into dressing carefully (as if you were going to an interview, we’d been told, and so I obeyed it to the letter, with the possible dress-rehearsal concession of purple nail polish) it had never occurred to me that it could be best to not meet a reporter in person. Why give them a paragraph describing your appearance, when that ink could be better spent transcribing what you said?

The section on earned media and new media galvanized me in an entirely different way. Never mind waiting for the call that follows disaster, scandal or newsroom boredom. Here were new-to-me possibilities for action. Did you know you — yes, you — can actually pitch a story to a reporter? Issue a press advisory, a press release, or a public service announcement?  And new media (which I already use, albeit without a great deal of direction) gives us the ability to form and maintain relationships and communicate directly with our audience, without an intermediary.

The workshop was everything I wanted, except that I wanted more, more, more. I left feeling for the first time that I could be in control of my message.

And that is both the point and the problem: I’m not yet. I’m still finding the words for what I want to say.  I only have the resources to find the tools to make the actions, etc. This is clearly going to be a work of slow progress and many mistakes.

To that end, I really hope some poor biased shmuck hails me in a bar in the next week. Finesse will come, but for now, the sheer force of my positivity might bowl them over.

There was talk of taking Speak Up! to San Francisco and Chicago and a couple of cities in Canada. I hope they can. I also would love to see this as a larger, longer, even more intensive program — perhaps twenty or thirty sex workers, really buckling down for a weekend. If you can donate, or know a potential donor, SWA wants to hear from you.

I want to give a world of thanks to Audacia Ray and Eliyanna Kaiser of Sex Work Awareness for creating this workshop, leading it, and doing the work to make it happen. And in equal measure, I want to thank the women of the NYC Sex Bloggers Calendar who raised the money that made it all possible.

I’m going to be pretty busy in the next couple of weeks as I go to San Francisco, Boston, DC and upstate — oh, and take my finals. But my new video camera will be traveling with me; I’ve done very little but shoot and edit video since I woke up this morning. When I travel, I meet a lot of people with amazing things to say, and I hope from here on out, I’ll be able to share more of those conversations with you.

April 15, 2009

nylons and duct tape, part 2

Filed under: begging, bondage, caning, crying, submission (or the lack thereof) — Calico @ 4:28 pm

The second rubber band went around my right thigh, tied snug so it sank into the welt.

He tied my nipple clamps up to the ceiling, with my hair. Elastics, too, I guessed. The first time he pulled on the strings and released them, I screamed thinking he had snapped the clamps right off. But the pain didn’t dissipate, and he did it again. And again. I couldn’t comprehend that anything could hurt so much.

He caned my inner thighs. Tested one cane, thuddier; decided on a medium one, a little whippier. I gritted my teeth and made inelegant noises somewhere between grunts and howls, but I can take a caning like a champ.

My undoing was quick when he started to snap the bands on my thighs. Each bite was ten times worse than the last, chewing into its own welt in the same spot. I yanked my knees together instinctively, keening like a puppy, and he lit into me with the cane. “Keep your legs spread!”

Shaking, I forced myself to spread my knees. Six inches’ difference wasn’t helping anyway. “Please, Sir. I can’t,” I choked through tears.

“You don’t have a choice, little girl.”

I’ve never been in the habit of letting people call me “little girl” (nor, for that matter, of addressing men as “sir” — especially with a capital letter). From this alone you might deduce that we had departed normality, and were rapidly approaching a place where this man’s pleasure was my immediate and only concern. I clung to the paternalism in his address. I wanted to be his good little girl. If he was getting off on using his little girl, it wasn’t meaningless torture: he wasn’t going to kill me and dump my body behind the woodshed. Probably.

More pulling and snapping of the horrible nipple clamps. I sobbed uncontrollably. The stocking-covered hole through which I was breathing was wet, the hood humid. He leaned in to my face with a low murmur of appreciation, like he was feeding on my fear.

His fingers slid between my legs. “You’re wet,” he observed. And he was right: I was dripping on the chair. I could feel it slick on his fingers as he played with my labia. I was in so much pain that being turned on was the last thing that would have occurred to me.

He tied new bands near my knees, and one around my waist. To the last, he fastened one through my legs and arranged it over my now swollen clit. I threw myself into a new round of frantic begging and squirming, which only got me caned for my trouble.

“Let’s play a game,” he said. “You get to pick which band I snap. You have five seconds to choose. You can only pick the same one twice in a row. If you don’t choose, I hit you with the cane. Do you understand?”

“Yes.”

What?”

I am such a disaster at this protocol business. “Yes, Sir. I understand you, Sir.”

He counted. “Five. Four.”

“Left knee,” I said reluctantly. Pain lanced across the tender, previously unassailed skin.

“Five.”

“Right knee.” I hissed as he snapped it.

“Five.” His voice was steely. Oh God oh God. “Left knee,” I said, knowing it would be awful on the previous mark, but not able to conscience going back to my thighs — or higher. “Oh! Right knee.” He snapped it particularly hard. “Fuck!”

I didn’t last a minute before I couldn’t bring myself to pick a band. Fresh tears were flowing unseen down my cheeks, sticking the tape hood to my face. He caned me across the thigh, counted to five again, struck me again.

“Pick, or I’ll keep caning you.”

“I would rather have the cane,” I sobbed.

He started laying down the cane harder, in sensitive areas — up the length of my thigh, into the crease, laying the tip across that fucking rubber band. Still he wouldn’t stop counting. I grew frantic. “I don’t like this game,” I pleaded.

“Oh, no?” His voice scared me. “Then we can play my game.”

He began snapping all the rubber bands at once, as hard and fast as he could.

I’d gotten myself into this mess weeks ago with flirtatious academic discussions, the sort that I jokingly deride as intellectual masturbation when I’m not, well, masturbating in front of my keyboard. Normally I have the good grace to be embarrassed about my “consensual non-consent” fantasies. That’s because I know the unpretty reality: trying not to choke on my own snot. Beforehand and afterward, it is unbearably exciting, but during, I would rather be somewhere (oh, God, anywhere) else.

Later I would notice I had bruised my arms struggling against the chair. I thought something in my synapses had short-circuited and the top of my head was going to pop off from the pain. When he paused I was babbling, incoherent. “Do you want to play my game?” he asked. “Or your game?”

I couldn’t understand what he meant. It was all his game.

He relented, possibly realizing I was not capable of high-level concepts like differentiating “right”, “left”, and body parts. We’d go over each of the rubber bands in turn and I would ask him to snap them. But I broke down again when we reached my waist. “I can’t, I can’t, I can’t!”

His fingers hovered, stretching the elastic, above my clit. “But I want to,” he insisted. “I want to. Don’t you want me to have what I want?”

From somewhere I heard myself say the words he was prompting: “Please, Sir.” And he snapped it, a white pain like flashbulbs going off at the base of my skull, while I cried and cried.

He wound my hands into balls with electrical tape and unlocked them from behind me. “You can,” he said, “take off the nipple clamps now.” I thought this was a very generous assessment of my ability. Sniffling, I felt around them hesitantly with my balled hands. I’d been expecting something metal with a screw; these were long, and I couldn’t find a screw.

“How do I get these off, Sir?”

“Creativity and pluck,” he replied genially.

I was taking too long. He offered to take them off for me, in exchange for ten cane strokes to each thigh. I refused not on grounds of the caning but for fear of how he might choose to remove them.

Then I had my first stroke of luck: my thumb popped out of the tape. “Is this fair?”

“Go ahead.” He sounded amused. “I knew I should have used the leather mitts.”

Wiggling my hands out of the tape, I ran fingertips over my nipples gingerly. The mystery clamps were chopsticks, held together by more rubber bands, so tightly I could barely unwind them. I was not sure I could have pulled them off and left the nipple behind.

He locked my wrists back behind the chair.

“You know what happens now, don’t you?” he asked. He began rolling my nipples lightly between his fingers, hurting me without trying. “Ask me to put them back on.”

I begged. I could feel a fresh, hot flood of tears on my cheeks. “No, Sir, please.”

“But I want to,” he said, like a little kid.

And I cried, because I wanted to give him this but I didn’t have it in me. “I can’t ask you, Sir,” I said, defeated. “But I can’t stop you from doing it.”

One last twist and he released me. “That’s all,” he said. “We’re done.” It seemed like a cue to pull myself together, so I tried to quiet my sobs. It was hard to stop crying. Where I had gone, it was a long way back.

Holding my hair, he dragged me down to my knees. He cut just enough of the hood away that I could open my mouth.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress